YI and the art of Paula

I still remember the air. Florida humidity resting on my skin like an extra shirt, the office A/C trying its best, and a tiny pressure mark where a headset rested on someone else’s temple, hour after hour. I was visiting a plumbing services company to talk about Mobile Workforce Management—routing, time windows, KPIs. But before we got to any of that, I met Paula.

You’d like her. Everyone did. Paula sat at the front desk with a kindness that arrived before her voice. Phone rings. click. “Good afternoon, how can I help?” And just like that, a conversation began—not a form, not a workflow, a conversation. A small human story.

The caller rarely arrived with tidy bullet points. They arrived with a drip behind the wall, a boiler that sulked all morning, a tenant waiting, a vague dread about insurance. They arrived with stress. Paula met them where they were. She asked only what mattered right now, in the order that served the caller—not the system. She listened. She translated. She sold gently.

And yet, in front of her was The Form.

You know the one: the intake sheet, the CRM object, the thing that loves order. Address. Best phone number. Access notes. Time window. Equipment model. Symptoms. Contract status. Email. Consent. Source. At least a dozen fields, sometimes two dozen, some of them mandatory, all of them hungry for structure.

I watched Paula work the space between. She typed sideways, hopping fields while keeping the caller’s rhythm intact. She never broke the spell—I’m with you, I’m helping you, I’m not just filling boxes. It was graceful. Honestly, it was art.

And that’s when I felt the friction.

The caller’s story flows like water. The system’s appetite is a grid. The value of Paula—the reason a human is in this loop—is empathy, timing, judgment. But the cost we snuck into her job was field‑hopping with one hand while she steered a delicate dialogue with the other. We asked her to be two things at once: counselor and stenographer.

I’ve seen the alternative too. No Paula. A website with a long form. Maybe a chat widget that feels like a form in disguise. Sometimes it works. Often it doesn’t. If you’re calling, it’s because you don’t want to fill boxes. Or you’re not sure which boxes matter yet. The very first thing the business asks is: give us structure. The very first thing the caller needs is: give me care.

Both sides are right. The organization needs clean data to schedule jobs, price fairly, learn patterns, and plan capacity. The human needs a steady voice and the feeling that someone is taking responsibility. That’s the conflict I kept seeing everywhere: conversation wants freedom; the business needs structure.

Here is the simple, slightly embarrassing truth I realized watching Paula: all the required data does emerge in the conversation. It always does. If it didn’t, the job couldn’t be done. The problem isn’t whether the information appears; it’s when and how it’s captured. Forcing the order of a form onto the tempo of a call taxes the one thing only a human can provide—rapport.

That afternoon, I wrote a sentence in my notebook: Let people talk. Let systems learn.

That sentence became YI.

YI listens to the moments where information is born—phone calls, voice notes, transcripts, even documents—and builds the structure the business needs without asking the human to break stride. While Paula is guiding the caller, YI is quietly extracting entities and facts: the address buried in the second minute, the boiler model mumbled once and corrected a moment later, the “Tuesday after 3pm” that actually means “any time after school pickup.” It reconciles them, checks for gaps, and composes the record the CRM expects—tickets, jobs, contacts, whatever object your world runs on.

When something essential is missing, YI doesn’t interrupt with a pop‑quiz. It suggests the lightest next question, at the right moment, in Paula’s tone—not the system’s. Paula stays the artist. YI does the filing.

What changes when the filing isn’t Paula’s job anymore?

• The conversation breathes. Fewer unnatural pivots to “What’s your email?” in the middle of describing a leak. Paula can ask just enough to move things forward.
• Data becomes trustworthy. Every job has the critical fields, consistently captured, even when callers jump around. Managers can filter, compare, and actually believe the numbers.
• Coaching turns into craft. Instead of QA being a hunt for missing fields, team leads can coach the timing and quality of questions—the human side that wins trust and converts calls.
• Learning compounds. Patterns across conversations are visible: which symptoms predict emergency work, which neighborhoods need longer time windows, which phrases correlate with cancellations. Insight without the paperwork penalty.

I think of Paula as the patron saint of intake. Watching her, I realized two more things.

First: the minimum-question strategy should be celebrated. The best intake feels like care, not interrogation. It earns permission to ask the next thing. That is a human strength. Keep it human.

Second: field‑hopping is valuable only because the system demands it in real time. That part is machine work. Offload it.

Once you see this, you can’t unsee it. The same pattern shows up everywhere:

• HVAC dispatch. A caller insists the unit “just hums.” The model number arrives halfway through—“Wait, it’s actually XR16”—right after the story about the toddler napping by the vent. YI hears both, tags the correction, and the tech shows up with the right part.
• Insurance first notice of loss. The policyholder is shaken, describing a rear‑end collision out of order. YI assembles the timeline, extracts the essentials, and surfaces one gentle follow‑up: “Were there any injuries?” One question, not five.
• Software support triage. A customer says “it times out sometimes” and later mentions “VPN” under their breath. YI links symptoms to context and proposes likely categories while the agent keeps the tone calm.

In each case, the conversation is the medium. Structure is the output. YI is the bridge.

I didn’t build YI to replace Paula. I built it because Paula’s art deserves a stage without stagehands tugging at her sleeves. I want the first minute of a call—the most fragile moment—to feel natural, generous, and competent. And I want the last minute to end with confidence that the job will be done, and that the system has everything it needs.

If you’ve worked a front desk, a dispatcher seat, a claims line, a support queue—you already know this dance. You’ve felt that tug between being present for a person and feeding a machine. You’ve mastered it despite the tools, not because of them.

YI tries to be the tool that finally honors the human way to work, while giving the organization the structure it needs to function and grow. People remain central. Systems get smarter. Everyone moves with less friction.

So let me ask you something.

Where in your company does this tension live? Which conversations—internal or external—start messy but end up needing a clean record? Intake? Scheduling? Support? Compliance? Field service? If a report, a ticket, or a CRM object is the destination, what’s the conversation that begins the journey?

If a conversation is where your information starts, let’s talk. I’d love to hear your use case, your Paula, your friction. Click the “Try it” button on our website and send a note. Start with a story, not a form. We’ll listen—and YI will do the rest.

‍